<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New iPod Touch and iPod Nano</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediamentalism.com/2008/07/30/new-ipod-touch-and-ipod-nano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediamentalism.com/2008/07/30/new-ipod-touch-and-ipod-nano/</link>
	<description>Gadgets that set media free</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Top alternatives to an iPod Touch</title>
		<link>http://mediamentalism.com/2008/07/30/new-ipod-touch-and-ipod-nano/#comment-72601</link>
		<dc:creator>Top alternatives to an iPod Touch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamentalism.com/?p=254#comment-72601</guid>
		<description>[...] slick when it first came out but Apple has not moved the technology on much since then. There are rumours of a new version of the iPod Touch coming in the near future but the changes proposed are far from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] slick when it first came out but Apple has not moved the technology on much since then. There are rumours of a new version of the iPod Touch coming in the near future but the changes proposed are far from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top alternatives to an iPod Touch</title>
		<link>http://mediamentalism.com/2008/07/30/new-ipod-touch-and-ipod-nano/#comment-72553</link>
		<dc:creator>Top alternatives to an iPod Touch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamentalism.com/?p=254#comment-72553</guid>
		<description>[...] slick when it first came out but Apple have not moved the technology on much since then. There are rumours of a new version of the iPod Touch coming in the near future but the changes proposed are far from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] slick when it first came out but Apple have not moved the technology on much since then. There are rumours of a new version of the iPod Touch coming in the near future but the changes proposed are far from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
